Where English language leads. Every connection below has a source: a link in this article, a shared Wikipedia category, or CirrusSearch text similarity. Articles already on your trail are left out.
English is a West Germanic language of the Indo-European language family that emerged in early medieval England and has since become a global lingua franca.
Old English was one of several Ingvaeonic languages, which emerged from a dialect continuum spoken by West Germanic peoples during the 5th century in Frisia, on the coast of the North Sea. Old English emerged among the Ingvaeonic speakers on the British Isles following their migration to the region, while the other Ingvaeonic languages (Frisian and Old Low German) developed in parallel on the European continent.15 Old English evolved into Middle English, which in turn evolved into Modern English.16 Particular dialects of Old and Middle English also developed into other Anglic languages, including Scots17 and the extinct Fingallian and Yola dialects of Ireland.18
English was isolated from other Germanic languages on the continent and diverged considerably in vocabulary, syntax, and phonology as a result. It is not mutually intelligible with any continental Germanic language – though some, such as Dutch and Frisian, share strong affinities with it, particularly in its earlier stages.19 English and Frisian were traditionally considered more closely related to one another than they were to other West Germanic languages, but most modern scholarship does not recognise a particular affinity between them.20 Though they shared similar sound changes that were found nowhere else around the North Sea at that time, the specific changes appeared in English and Frisian at different times – a pattern that is uncharacteristic of languages that share a unique phylogenetic ancestor.2122
Manuscript (written in uncial script) of Beowulf, an epic poem composed in Old English between 975 and 1025. The poem begins: Hƿæt ƿē Gārde / na ingēar dagum þēod cyninga / þrym ge frunon ... [Listen! We have heard of the glory in bygone days of the folk-kings of the spear-Danes ...]23
Old English (also called Anglo-Saxon) was the earliest form of the English language, spoken from c. 450 to c. 1150. Old English developed from a set of West Germanic dialects, sometimes identified as Anglo-Frisian or North Sea Germanic, originally spoken along the coasts of Frisia, Lower Saxony and southern Jutland by the Germanic peoples known from historical records as the Angles, , and . From the 5th century, the Anglo-Saxons as . By the 7th century, Old English – replacing the and previously spoken during the , which left little influence on English. and (originally and ) are both named after the Angles.
Majority native language Co-official and majority native language Official but minority native language Secondary language: spoken as a second language by more than 20 per cent of the population, de facto working language of government, language of instruction in education, etc.3
EF English Proficiency Index 2019 in Europe:68 Very high (63.07–70.27) High (58.26–61.86) Moderate (52.50–57.38) Low (48.69–52.39) Very low (40.87–48.19) Not included in report
Dialectologists identify many English dialects, which usually refer to regional varieties that differ from each other in terms of patterns of grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation. The pronunciation of particular areas distinguishes dialects as separate regional accents. The major native dialects of English are often divided by linguists into two extremely general categories: British English (BrE) and North American English (NAE).144
Britain and Ireland
Primary dialect regions in the United Kingdom and Ireland
The fact that English has been spoken in England for 1,500 years explains why England has a great wealth of regional dialects.145 Within the United Kingdom, Received Pronunciation (RP), an educated accent associated originally with , has been traditionally used as a broadcast standard and is considered the most prestigious of British accents. The spread of RP (also known as BBC English) through the media has caused many traditional dialects of rural England to recede, as youths adopt the traits of the prestige variety instead of those from local dialects. At the time of the 1950–61 , grammar and vocabulary differed across the country, but a process of lexical attrition has led most of this variation to disappear.
English phonology and phonetics differ from one dialect to another, usually without interfering with mutual communication. Phonological variation affects the inventory of phonemes (speech sounds that distinguish meaning), and phonetic variation consists in differences in pronunciation of the phonemes.198 This overview mainly describes Received Pronunciation (RP) and General American (GA), the standard varieties of the United Kingdom and the United States respectively.199200201
Consonants
Most English dialects share the same 24 consonant phonemes (or 26, if marginal /x/ and glottal stop /ʔ/ are included). The consonant inventory shown below is valid for California English,202 and for RP.203
Since the 9th century, English has been written using the English alphabet, which uses the Latin script. Anglo-Saxon runes were previously used to write Old English, but only in short inscriptions; the overwhelming majority of attested writings in Old English are in the Old English Latin alphabet.32
English orthography is multi-layered and complex, with elements of French, Latin, and Greek spelling on top of the native Germanic system.233 Further complications have arisen through sound changes with which the orthography has not kept pace.49 Compared to European languages for which official organisations have promoted spelling reforms, English has spelling that is a less consistent indicator of pronunciation, and standard spellings of words that are more difficult to guess from knowing how a word is pronounced.234 There are also systematic spelling differences between British and American English. These situations have prompted proposals for spelling reform in English.235
Typical for an Indo-European language, English grammar follows accusativemorphosyntactic alignment. Unlike other Indo-European languages, English has largely abandoned the inflectional case system in favour of analytic constructions. Only the personal pronouns retain morphological case more strongly than any other word class. English distinguishes at least seven major word classes: verbs, nouns, adjectives, adverbs, determiners (including articles), prepositions, and conjunctions. Some analyses add pronouns as a class separate from nouns, and subdivide conjunctions into subordinators and coordinators, and add the class of interjections.246 English also has a rich set of auxiliary verbs, such as have and do, expressing the categories of mood and aspect. Questions are marked by do-support, wh-movement (fronting of question words beginning with wh-) and word order inversion with some verbs.247
Vocabulary
The English lexicon consists of around 170,000 words (or 220,000, if counting obsolete words), according to an estimate based on the 1989 edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.309 Over one-half are nouns, one-quarter are adjectives, and one-seventh are verbs. Another estimate – which includes scientific jargon, prefixed and suffixed words, loanwords of extremely limited use, technical acronyms, etc. – counts around 1 million total English words.310
English borrows vocabulary quickly from many languages and other sources. Early studies of English vocabulary by lexicographers (scholars who study vocabulary and compile dictionaries) were impeded by a lack of comprehensive data on actual vocabulary in use from high-quality linguistic corpora311 (collections of actual written texts and spoken passages). Many statements published before the end of the 20th century about the growth of English vocabulary over time, the dates of first use of various words in English, and the sources of English vocabulary will have to be corrected as new computerised analyses of linguistic corpus data become available.312313
Word-formation processes
English forms new words from existing words or roots in its vocabulary through a variety of processes. One of the most productive processes in English is conversion, using a word with a different grammatical role, for example using a noun as a verb or a verb as a noun. Another productive word-formation process is nominal compounding, producing compound words such as or or .
Old English was divided into two Anglian dialects (Mercian and Northumbrian) and two Saxon dialects (Kentish and West Saxon).29 Through the influence of the kingdom of Wessex and the educational reforms instated by King Alfred during the 9th century, the West Saxon dialect became the standard written variety.30 The epic poem Beowulf is written in West Saxon, and the earliest English poem, Cædmon's Hymn, is written in Northumbrian.31 Modern English developed mainly from Mercian, but the Scots language developed from Northumbrian. During the earliest period of Old English, a few short inscriptions were made using a runic alphabet.32 By the 7th century, a Latin alphabet had been adopted. Written with half-uncialletterforms, it included the runic letters wynn ⟨ƿ⟩ and thorn ⟨þ⟩, and the modified Latin letters eth ⟨ð⟩ and ash ⟨æ⟩.3233
Old English is markedly different from Modern English; 21st‑century English speakers are entirely unable to understand Old English without special training. Its grammar was similar to that of modern German: nouns, adjectives, pronouns, and verbs had many more inflectional endings and forms, and word order was much freer than in Modern English. Modern English has case forms in pronouns (he, him, his) and a few verb inflections (speak, speaks, speaking, spoke, spoken), but Old English had case endings in nouns as well, and verbs had more person and number endings.343536
Influence of Old Norse
Between the 8th and 11th centuries, the English spoken in some regions underwent significant changes due to contact with Old Norse, a North Germanic language. Several waves of Norsemen colonising the northern British Isles in the 8th and 9th centuries brought Old English speakers into constant contact with Old Norse. Norse influence was strongest in the north‑eastern varieties of Old English spoken in the Danelaw surrounding York; today these features are still particularly evident in Scots and Northern English. The centre of Norse influence was Lindsey, located in the Midlands. After Lindsey was incorporated into the Anglo‑Saxon polity in 920, English spread extensively throughout the region. One element of Norse influence that persists in all English varieties today is the third‑person pronoun group beginning with th- (they, them, their), which replaced the Anglo‑Saxon pronouns with h- (hie, him, hera).37
Other Norse loanwords include give, get, sky, skirt, egg, and cake, typically displacing a native Anglo‑Saxon equivalent. Old Norse in this era remained largely mutually intelligible with some dialects of Old English, particularly northern ones.38
Englischmen þeyz hy hadde fram þe bygynnyng þre manner speche, Souþeron, Northeron, and Myddel speche in þe myddel of þe lond, ... Noþeles by comyxstion and mellyng, furst wiþ Danes, and afterward wiþ Normans, in menye þe contray longage ys asperyed, and som vseþ strange wlaffyng, chyteryng, harryng, and garryng grisbytting.
[Although, from the beginning, Englishmen had three manners of speaking, southern, northern and midlands speech in the middle of the country, ... Nevertheless, through intermingling and mixing, first with Danes and then with Normans, amongst many the country language has arisen, and some use strange stammering, chattering, snarling, and grating gnashing.]
The Middle English period is often defined as beginning with the Norman Conquest in 1066. During the centuries that followed, English was heavily influenced by the form of Old French spoken by the new Norman ruling class that had migrated to England (known as Old Norman). Over the following decades of contact, members of the middle and upper classes, whether native English or Norman, became increasingly bilingual. By 1150 at the latest, bilingual speakers represented a majority of the English aristocracy, and monolingual French speakers were nearly non‑existent.40 The French spoken by the Norman elite in England eventually developed into the Anglo-Norman language.41 The transition from Old to Middle English can also be placed during the composition of the Ormulum (c. late 12th century), a work by the Augustinian canon Orrm which highlights the blending of Old English and Anglo‑Norman elements in the language for the first time.4243
As the lower classes, who represented the vast majority of the population, remained monolingual English speakers, the primary influence of Norman was as a lexical superstratum, introducing a wide range of loanwords related to politics, legislation, and prestigious social domains.10 For instance, the French word trône appears for the first time, from which the English word throne is derived.44 Middle English also greatly simplified the inflectional system, probably in order to reconcile Old Norse and Old English, which were inflectionally different but morphologically similar. The distinction between nominative and accusative cases was lost except in personal pronouns; the instrumental case was dropped; and the use of the genitive case was limited to indicating possession. The inflectional system regularised many irregular inflectional forms,45 and gradually simplified the system of agreement, making word order less flexible.46
Middle English literature includes Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (c. 1400) and Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur (1485). During the Middle English period, the use of regional dialects in writing proliferated, and dialect traits were even used for effect by authors such as Chaucer.47 In the first translation of the entire Bible into English by John Wycliffe (1382), Matthew 8:20 reads: "Foxis han dennes, and briddis of heuene han nestis."48 Here the plural suffix -n on the verb have is still retained, but none of the case endings on the nouns are present.
Illustration of the Great Vowel Shift that affected long vowels in Early Modern English. After the highest vowels /i: u:/ broke into diphthongs /ai au/, each of the lower vowels gradually shifted up one level to compensate.
The period of Early Modern English, lasting from 1500 to 1700, was characterised by the Great Vowel Shift (1350–1700), inflectional simplification, and linguistic standardisation. The Great Vowel Shift affected the stressed long vowels of Middle English. It was a chain shift, meaning that each shift triggered a subsequent shift in the vowel system. Mid and open vowels were raised, and close vowels were broken into diphthongs. For example, the word bite was originally pronounced as the word beet is today, and the second vowel in the word about was pronounced as the word boot is today. The Great Vowel Shift explains many irregularities in spelling, since English retains many spellings from Middle English, and it also explains why English vowel letters have very different pronunciations from the same letters in other languages.4950
English began to rise in prestige relative to Norman French during the reign of Henry V. Around 1430, the Court of Chancery in Westminster began using English in its official documents, and a new standard form of Middle English, known as Chancery Standard, developed from the dialects of London and the East Midlands. In 1476, William Caxton introduced the printing press to England and began publishing the first printed books in London, thereby expanding the influence of this form of English.51
Literature in Early Modern English includes the works of William Shakespeare and the 1611 King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. Even after the vowel shift, the language still sounded different from Modern English: for example, the consonant clusters /kn ɡn sw/ in knight, gnat, and sword were still pronounced. Many of the grammatical features that a modern reader of Shakespeare might find quaint or archaic represent the distinct characteristics of Early Modern English.52 Matthew 8:20 in the KJV reads: "The Foxes have holes and the birds of the ayre have nests."53 This exemplifies the loss of case and its effects on sentence structure (replacement with subject–verb–object word order and the use of of instead of the non‑possessive genitive), as well as the introduction of loanwords from French (ayre) and word replacements (bird, originally meaning 'nestling', which had replaced Old English fugol).53
Spread of Modern English
By the late 18th century, the British Empire had spread English through its colonies and geopolitical dominance. Commerce, science and technology, diplomacy, art, and formal education all contributed to English becoming the first truly global language. English also facilitated worldwide international communication.544 English was adopted in parts of North America, parts of Africa, Oceania, and many other regions. When they obtained political independence, some of the newly independent states that had multiple indigenous languages opted to continue using English as the official language, in order to avoid the political and other difficulties inherent in promoting any one indigenous language above the others.555657 In the 20th century, the growing economic and cultural influence of the United States and its status as a superpower following the Second World War – along with worldwide broadcasting in English by the BBC58 and other broadcasters – has caused the language to spread across the planet much faster.5960
As Modern English developed, explicit norms for standard usage were published and spread through official media such as public education and state‑sponsored publications. In 1755, Samuel Johnson published his Dictionary of the English Language, which introduced standard spellings of words and usage norms. In 1828, Noah Webster published the American Dictionary of the English Language to establish a norm for speaking and writing American English independent of the British standard. Within Britain, non‑standard or lower‑class dialect features were increasingly stigmatised, leading to the rapid spread of the prestige varieties among the middle classes.63
In modern English, the loss of grammatical case is almost complete (it is now found only in pronouns, such as he and him, she and her, who and whom), and subject–verb–object word order is largely fixed.63 Some changes, such as the use of do-support, have become universalised. (Earlier English did not use the word do as a general auxiliary as Modern English does; at first it was used only in question constructions, and even then it was not obligatory.64 Now, do-support with the verb have is becoming increasingly standardised.) The use of progressive forms ending in -ing appears to be spreading to new constructions, and forms such as "had been being built" are becoming more common. Regularisation of irregular forms also continues slowly (e.g. dreamed instead of dreamt), and analytical alternatives to inflectional forms are becoming more common (e.g. more polite instead of politer). British English is also undergoing change under the influence of American English, fuelled by the strong presence of American English in the media.656667
As of 2016, 400 million people spoke English as their first language, and 1.1 billion spoke it as a second language.69 English is the largest language by number of speakers, spoken by communities on every continent.70 Estimates of second‑language and foreign‑language speakers vary greatly depending on how proficiency is defined, ranging from 470 million to more than 1 billion.71 In 2003, David Crystal estimated that non‑native speakers outnumbered native speakers by a ratio of three to one.72
Three circles model
Braj Kachru has categorised countries into the Three Circles of English model, according to how the language historically spread in each country, how it is acquired by the population, and the range of uses it has there – with a country's classification being able to change over time.7374
"Inner‑circle" countries have large communities of native English speakers; these include the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand (where the majority speaks English), as well as South Africa (where a significant minority speaks English). The countries with the most native English speakers are, in descending order: the United States (at least 231 million),75 the United Kingdom (60 million),767778 Canada (19 million),79 Australia (at least 17 million),80 South Africa (4.8 million),81 Ireland (4.2 million), and New Zealand (3.7 million).82 In these countries, children of native speakers learn English from their parents; citizens with other first languages, as well as incoming immigrants, learn English in order to communicate in local English‑speaking neighbourhoods and workplaces.83 Inner‑circle countries are the base from which English spreads to other regions of the world.73
"Outer‑circle" countries – such as the Philippines,84 Jamaica,85 India, Pakistan, Singapore,86 Malaysia, and Nigeria8788 – have much smaller proportions of native English speakers, but the use of English as a second language in education, government, or domestic business is significant, and its use for instruction in schools and for official government operations is routine.89 These countries have millions of native speakers on dialect continua, which range from English-based creole languages to standard varieties of English used in inner‑circle countries. They have many more speakers who acquire English as they grow up through day‑to‑day use and exposure to English‑language broadcasting, especially if they attend schools where English is the language of instruction. Varieties of English learned by non‑native speakers born to English‑speaking parents may be influenced, especially in their grammar, by the other languages spoken by those learners – with most including words rarely used by native speakers in inner‑circle countries, as well as grammatical and phonological differences from inner‑circle varieties.83
"Expanding‑circle" countries are those where English is taught as a foreign language,90 though the character of English as a first, second, or foreign language in a given country is often debatable and may change over time.89 For example, in countries such as the Netherlands, an overwhelming majority of the population can speak English,91 and it is often used in higher education and to communicate with foreigners.92
Pluricentric English
English is a pluricentric language, which means that no single national authority sets the standard for its use.93949596 Spoken English, including English used in broadcasting, generally follows national pronunciation standards that are established by custom rather than by regulation. International broadcasters are usually identifiable as coming from one country rather than another through their accents,97 but newsreader scripts are also composed largely in international standard written English. The norms of standard written English are maintained purely by the consensus of educated English speakers around the world, without any oversight by any government or international organisation.98
American listeners readily understand most British broadcasting, and British listeners readily understand most American broadcasting. Most English speakers around the world can understand radio programmes, television programmes, and films from many parts of the English-speaking world.99 Both standard and non‑standard varieties of English can include formal or informal styles, distinguished by word choice and syntax, and they use both technical and non‑technical registers.100
The settlement history of the English‑speaking inner‑circle countries outside Britain helped to level dialect distinctions and produce koiné forms of English in South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.101 The majority of immigrants to the United States without British ancestry rapidly adopted English after arrival. Now the majority of the United States population are monolingual English speakers.75102
Australia has no official languages at the federal or state level.103
In Canada, English and French share official status at the federal level.104105 English has official or co‑official status in six provinces and three territories, while three provinces have none, and Quebec's only official language is French.106
English is the official second language of Ireland, while Irish is the first.107
The United Kingdom does not have an official language. In Wales and Northern Ireland, English is co‑official alongside Welsh110 and Irish111 respectively. Neither Scotland nor England has an official language.
In the United States, English was designated the official language of the country by Executive Order 14224 in 2025.112 English has additional official or co‑official status at the state level in 32 states and all 5 territories;113 18 states and the District of Columbia have no official language.
Status of English in public education by region114 Mandatory subject Optional subject No data
2014 English Proficiency Index115 Very high (80–100 per cent) High (60–80 per cent) Moderate (40–60 per cent) Low (20–40 per cent) Very low (0.1–20 per cent) No data
Modern English is sometimes described as the first global lingua franca,59116 or as the first world language.117118 English is the world's most widely used language in newspaper publishing, book publishing, international telecommunications, scientific publishing, international trade, mass entertainment, and diplomacy.118 Parity with French as a language of diplomacy had been achieved by the Treaty of Versailles negotiations in 1919.119 By the time the United Nations was founded at the end of the Second World War, English had become pre‑eminent;120 it is one of the six official languages of the United Nations121 and is now the main worldwide language of diplomacy and international relations.122 Many other worldwide international organisations, including the International Olympic Committee, specify English as a working language or official language of the organisation. Many regional international organisations, such as the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN),60 and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), use English as their sole working language, despite most members not being countries with a majority of native English speakers. While the EU allows member states to designate any of the national languages as an official language of the Union, in practice English is the main working language of EU organisations.123 English serves as the basis for the required controlled natural languages124Seaspeak and Airspeak, used as international languages of seafaring125 and aviation.126
English is the most frequently taught foreign language in the world.5960 Most people learning English do so for practical reasons, as opposed to ideological ones.127 In EU countries, English is the most widely spoken foreign language in 19 of the 25 member states where it is not an official language (that is, the countries other than Ireland and Malta). In a 2012 official Eurobarometer poll (conducted when the UK was still a member of the EU), 38 per cent of EU respondents outside the countries where English is an official language said they could speak English well enough to have a conversation in that language. The next most commonly mentioned foreign language, French (which is the most widely known foreign language in the UK and Ireland), could be used in conversation by 12 per cent of respondents.128 The global influence of English has led to concerns about language death,129 and to claims of linguistic imperialism,130 and has provoked resistance to the spread of English; however, the number of speakers continues to increase because many people around the world believe that English provides them with better employment opportunities and an increased quality of life.131
Working knowledge of English has become a requirement in a number of occupations and professions, such as medicine132 and computing. Though it formerly had parity with French and German in scientific research, English now dominates the field.133 Its importance in scientific publishing is such that over 80 per cent of scientific journal articles indexed by Chemical Abstracts in 1998 were written in English, as were 90 per cent of all articles in natural science publications by 1996, and 82 per cent of articles in humanities publications by 1995.134
As decolonisation proceeded throughout the British Empire in the 1950s and 1960s, former colonies often did not reject English but rather continued to use it as independent countries setting their own language policies.5657135 For example, English is one of the official languages of India. Many Indians have shifted from associating the language with colonialism to associating it with economic progress.136 English is widely used in media and literature, with India being the third‑largest publisher of English‑language books in the world, after the US and the UK.137 However, fewer than 5 per cent of the population speak English fluently, with the country's native English speakers numbering in the low hundreds of thousands.138139 In 2004, David Crystal claimed that India had the largest population of people able to speak or understand English in the world,140 though most scholars estimate that the US remains home to a larger English‑speaking population.141 Many English speakers in Africa have become part of an 'Afro‑Saxon' language community that unites Africans from different countries.142 Regarding its future development, it is considered most likely that English will continue to function as a koiné language, with a standard form that unifies speakers around the world.143
Nonetheless, this attrition has mostly affected dialectal variation in grammar and vocabulary. Only 3% of the English population actually speak RP, with the remainder speaking in regional accents and dialects with varying degrees of RP influence.147 There is also variability within RP, particularly along class lines between upper‑ and middle‑class RP speakers, and between native RP speakers and those who adopt RP later in life.148 Within Britain, there is also considerable variation along lines of social class; some traits, though exceedingly common, are nonetheless considered 'non‑standard' and associated with lower‑class speakers and identities. An example of this is h-dropping, which was historically a feature of lower‑class London English, particularly Cockney, and can now be heard in the local accents of most parts of England. However, it remains largely absent from broadcasting and among the upper crust of British society.149
English in England can be divided into four major dialect regions: South East English, South West English (also known as West Country English), Midlands English, and Northern English. Within each of these regions, several local dialects exist: within the Northern region, there is a division between the Yorkshire dialects, the Geordie dialect (spoken around Newcastle in Northumbria), and the Lancashire dialects, which include the urban subdialects of Manchester (Mancunian) and Liverpool (Scouse). Having been the centre of Danish occupation during the Viking invasions of England, Northern English dialects, particularly the Yorkshire dialect, retain Norse features not found in other English varieties.150 In the West Midlands, dialects such as Black Country (Yam Yam), and to a lesser extent Birmingham (Brummie), preserve archaic features from Early Modern and Middle English, retaining Germanic elements such as specific grammatical structures and vocabulary.151
Since the 15th century, South East England varieties have centred on London, which has been the centre from which dialectal innovations have spread to other dialects. In London, the Cockney dialect was traditionally used by the lower classes, and it was long a socially stigmatised variety. The spread of Cockney features across the South East led the media to talk of Estuary English as a new dialect, but the notion was criticised by many linguists on the grounds that London had been influencing neighbouring regions throughout history.152153154 Traits that have spread from London in recent decades include the use of intrusive R (drawing is pronounced "drawring" /ˈdrɔːrɪŋ/), t-glottalisation (Potter is pronounced with a glottal stop as Po'er /ˈpɒʔə/), and th-fronting, or the pronunciation of th- as /f/ (thanks pronounced "fanks") or /v/ (bother pronounced "bover").155
Scots is today considered a separate language from English, but it has its origins in early Northern Middle English156 and developed and changed during its history with influence from other sources, particularly Scottish Gaelic and Old Norse. Scots itself has a number of regional dialects. In addition to Scots, Scottish English comprises the varieties of Standard English spoken in Scotland; most varieties are Northern English accents, with some influence from Scots.157
In Ireland, various forms of English have been spoken following the Norman invasion of the island during the 11th century. In County Wexford and the area surrounding Dublin, two extinct dialects known as Forth and Bargy and Fingallian developed as offshoots from Early Middle English and were spoken until the 19th century. Modern Irish English, however, has its roots in English colonisation in the 17th century. Today Irish English is divided into Ulster English (the Northern Ireland dialect with strong influence from Scots) and various other dialects of Ireland. Like Scottish and most North American accents, almost all Irish accents preserve the rhoticity that has been lost in the dialects influenced by RP.18158
Rhoticity dominates in North American English, but The Atlas of North American English found over 50 per cent non-rhoticity, with at least one local speaker in each US metropolitan area (marked with a red dot) and non-rhotic AAVE pronunciations found primarily among African Americans regardless of location.
Due to the relatively strong degree of mixing, mutual accommodation, and koinéisation that occurred during the colonial period, North American English has traditionally been perceived as relatively homogeneous, at least in comparison with British dialects. However, modern scholars have strongly opposed this notion, arguing that North American English shows a great deal of phonetic, lexical, and geographic variability. This becomes all the more apparent considering social, ethnolinguistic, and regional varieties such as African-American English, Chicano English, Cajun English, or Newfoundland English.159 American accent variation is increasing at the regional level and decreasing at the very local level,160 though most Americans still speak within a phonological continuum of similar accents,161 known collectively as General American English (GA), with differences hardly noticed even among Americans themselves, including Midland and Western American English.162163164
In most American and Canadian English dialects, rhoticity (or r-fullness) is dominant, with non-rhoticity (or r-dropping) being associated with lower prestige and social class, especially since the end of World War II. This contrasts with the situation in England, where non-rhoticity has become the standard.168 Varieties beyond GA which have developed distinct sound systems include the Southern American English, New York City English, Eastern New England English, and African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) groups – all of which are historically non-rhotic, save a few varieties of Southern American.
In Southern American English, the most populous grouping outside GA,169 rhoticity now strongly prevails, replacing the region's historical non-rhotic prestige.170171172 Southern accents are colloquially described as a "drawl" or "twang",173 being recognised most readily by the Southern Vowel Shift initiated by glide-deleting in the /aɪ/ vowel (e.g. pronouncing spy almost like spa), the "Southern breaking" of several front pure vowels into a gliding vowel or even two syllables (e.g. pronouncing the word press almost like "pray-us"),174 the pin–pen merger, and other distinctive phonological, grammatical, and lexical features, many of which are actually recent developments of the 19th century or later.175
Spoken primarily by working- and middle-class African Americans, African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) is largely non-rhotic, and likely originated among enslaved Africans and African Americans influenced primarily by the non-standard older Southern dialects. A minority of linguists,176 contrarily, propose that AAVE mostly traces back to African languages spoken by the slaves who had to develop a pidgin or English-based creole to communicate with slaves of other ethnic and linguistic origins.177 AAVE's important commonalities with Southern accents suggest it developed into a highly coherent and homogeneous variety in the 19th or early 20th century. AAVE is commonly stigmatised in North America as a form of "broken" or "uneducated" English, as are white Southern accents, but linguists today recognise both as fully developed varieties of English with their own norms shared by large speech communities.178179
Australia and New Zealand
Since 1788, English has been spoken in Oceania, and Australian English has developed as the first language of the vast majority of the inhabitants of the Australian continent, its standard accent being General Australian. The English of neighbouring New Zealand has, to a lesser degree, become an influential standard variety of the language.180 Australian and New Zealand English are each other's closest relatives, with few differentiating characteristics, followed by South African English and the English of South East England, all of which have similarly non‑rhotic accents (aside from some accents in the South Island of New Zealand). Australian and New Zealand English stand out for their innovative vowels: many short vowels are fronted or raised, whereas many long vowels have been diphthongised. Australian English also has a contrast between long and short vowels that is not found in most other varieties. Australian English grammar aligns closely with British and American English. New Zealand English uses front vowels that are often even higher than those in Australian English.181182183
Southeast Asia
English is an official language of the Philippines. Its use is ubiquitous in the country, appearing on street signs, marquees, and government documents, as well as in courtrooms, public media, the entertainment industry, and the business sector. It became an important and widely spoken language in the country during the period of American rule between 1898 and 1946.184Taglish is a prominent form of code-switching between Tagalog and English.185
Africa, the Caribbean, and South Asia
English is spoken widely in southern Africa and is an official or co‑official language in several of the region's countries. In South Africa, English has been spoken since 1820, co‑existing with Afrikaans and various African languages such as the Khoe and Bantu languages. Today, about nine per cent of the South African population speaks South African English (SAE) as a first language. SAE is a non‑rhotic variety that tends to follow RP as a norm. It is one of the few non‑rhotic English varieties that lack intrusive R. The second‑language varieties of South Africa differ according to the native languages of their speakers.186 Most phonological differences from RP are in the vowels.187 Consonantal differences include the tendency to pronounce /p, t, t͡ʃ, k/ without aspiration (e.g. pin pronounced [pɪn] rather than [pʰɪn] as in most other varieties), while 'r' is often pronounced as a flap [ɾ] instead of as the more common fricative.188
Nigerian English is a variety of English spoken in Nigeria; over 150 million Nigerians speak some form of the language.189 Though traditionally based on British English, increasing United States influence during the latter part of the 20th century has resulted in American English vocabulary entering Nigerian English. Additionally, some new words and collocations have emerged from the variety out of a need to express concepts specific to the nation's culture (e.g. senior wife).190
Varieties of English are spoken throughout the former British colonial possessions in the Caribbean, including Jamaica, the Leeward and Windward Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, the Cayman Islands, and Belize. Each of these areas is home both to a local variety of English and a local English‑based creole, combining English and African languages. The most prominent varieties are Jamaican English and Jamaican Creole. In Central America, English‑based creoles are spoken on the Caribbean coasts of Nicaragua and Panama.191 Residents are often fluent in both the local English variety and the local creole languages, and frequently code-switch between them. The relationship between different varieties can be conceptualised as a continuum, in which more creole‑like or RP‑like forms function as more formal and informal registers of the language respectively.192
Most Caribbean varieties are based on British English and, consequently, most are non‑rhotic, except for formal styles of Jamaican English, which are often rhotic. Jamaican English differs from RP in its vowel inventory, which has a distinction between long and short vowels rather than tense and lax vowels as in Standard English. The diphthongs /ei/ and /ou/ are monophthongs [eː] and [oː] or even the reverse diphthongs [ie] and [uo] (e.g. bay and boat pronounced [bʲeː] and [bʷoːt]). Often, word‑final consonant clusters are simplified so that "child" is pronounced [t͡ʃail] and "wind" [win].193194195
Indian English historically tends towards RP as an ideal, with the proximity of speakers to RP generally reflecting class distinctions. Indian English accents are marked by the pronunciation of phonemes such as /t/ and /d/ (often pronounced with retroflex articulation as [ʈ] and [ɖ]) and the replacement of /θ/ and /ð/ with dentals [t̪] and [d̪]. Sometimes Indian English speakers may also use spelling‑based pronunciations, where the silent ⟨h⟩ found in words such as ghost is pronounced as an Indian voiced aspirated stop [ɡʱ].196
Non-native varieties
Non‑native English speakers may pronounce words differently because they have not fully mastered English pronunciation. This can happen either because they apply the speech rules of their mother tongue to English ('interference') or because they implement strategies similar to those used in first language acquisition. They may create novel pronunciations for English sounds that do not exist in their first language.197
For pairs of obstruents (stops, affricates, and fricatives) such as /p b/, /tʃ dʒ/, and /s z/, the first is fortis (strong) and the second is lenis (weak). Fortis obstruents, such as /p tʃ s/ are pronounced with more muscular tension and breath force than lenis consonants, such as /b dʒ z/, and are always voiceless. Lenis consonants are partly voiced at the beginning and end of utterances, and fully voiced between vowels. Fortis stops such as /p/ have additional articulatory or acoustic features in most dialects: they are aspirated [pʰ] when they occur alone at the beginning of a stressed syllable, often unaspirated in other cases, and often unreleased [p̚] or pre-glottalised [ʔp] at the end of a syllable. In a single-syllable word, a vowel before a fortis stop is shortened: e.g. nip has a noticeably shorter vowel (phonetically, not phonemically) than nib [nɪˑb̥] (see below).204
Lenis stops: bin [b̥ɪˑn], about [əˈbaʊt], nib [nɪˑb̥]
In RP, the lateral approximant /l/ has two main allophones (pronunciation variants): the clear or plain [l], as in light, and the dark or velarised [ɫ], as in full.205 GA has dark l in most cases.206
Clear l: RP light [laɪt]
Dark l: RP and GA full [fʊɫ], GA light [ɫaɪt]
All sonorants (liquids /l, r/ and nasals /m, n, ŋ/) devoice when following a voiceless obstruent, and they are syllabic when following a consonant at the end of a word.207
Voiceless sonorants: clay [kl̥eɪ̯]; snow RP [sn̥əʊ̯], GA [sn̥oʊ̯]
The pronunciation of vowels varies a great deal between dialects and is one of the most detectable aspects of a speaker's accent. The accompanying table below lists the vowel phonemes in RP and GA, with example words from lexical sets. The vowels are represented with symbols from the International Phonetic Alphabet; those given for RP are standard in British dictionaries and other publications.208
In RP, vowel length is phonemic; long vowels are marked with a triangular colon ⟨ː⟩ in the table above, such as the vowel of need [niːd] as opposed to bid [bɪd].209 In GA, vowel length is non-distinctive.210
In both RP and GA, vowels are phonetically shortened before fortis consonants in the same syllable, like /t tʃ f/, but not before lenis consonants like /d dʒ v/ or in open syllables: thus, the vowels of rich [rɪtʃ], neat [nit], and safe [seɪ̯f] are noticeably shorter than the vowels of ridge [rɪˑdʒ], need [niˑd], and save [seˑɪ̯v], and the vowel of light [laɪ̯t] is shorter than that of lie [laˑɪ̯]. Because lenis consonants are frequently voiceless at the end of a syllable, vowel length is an important cue as to whether the following consonant is lenis or fortis.211
The vowel /ə/ only occurs in unstressed syllables and is more open in quality in stem-final positions.212213 Some dialects do not contrast /ɪ/ and /ə/ in unstressed positions, such that rabbit and abbot rhyme and Lenin and Lennon are homophonous, a dialectal feature called the weak vowel merger.214 GA /ɜr/ and /ər/ are realised as an r-coloured vowel [ɚ], as in further [ˈfɚðɚ] (phonemically /ˈfɜrðər/), which in RP is realised as [ˈfəːðə] (phonemically /ˈfɜːðə/).215
Phonotactics
An English syllable includes a syllable nucleus consisting of a vowel sound. Syllable onset and coda (start and end) are optional. A syllable can start with up to three consonant sounds, as in sprint /sprɪnt/, and end with up to five, as in (for some dialects) angsts /aŋksts/. This gives an English syllable a structure of (CCC)V(CCCCC) – where C represents a consonant and V a vowel. The word strengths /strɛŋθs/ is thus close to the most complex syllable possible in English. The consonants that may appear together in onsets or codas are restricted, as is the order in which they may appear. Onsets can only have four types of consonant clusters: a stop and approximant, as in play; a voiceless fricative and approximant, as in fly or sly; s and a voiceless stop, as in stay; and s, a voiceless stop, and an approximant, as in string.216 Clusters of nasal and stop are only allowed in codas. Clusters of obstruents always agree in voicing, and clusters of sibilants and of plosives with the same point of articulation are prohibited. Several consonants have limited distributions: /h/ can only occur in syllable-initial position, and /ŋ/ only in syllable-final position.217
Stress plays an important role in English. Certain syllables are stressed, while others are unstressed. Stress is a combination of duration, intensity, vowel quality, and sometimes changes in pitch. Stressed syllables are pronounced longer and louder than unstressed syllables, and vowels in unstressed syllables are frequently reduced while vowels in stressed syllables are not.218
Stress in English is phonemic, gaining freedom and dynamicity once lost in Proto-Germanic through a majority of borrowings from non-Germanic languages. For instance, the word contract is stressed on the first syllable (/ˈkɒntrækt/ KON-trakt) when used as a noun, but on the last syllable (/kənˈtrækt/ kən-TRAKT) for most meanings (for example, "reduce in size") when used as a verb.219220221 Here stress is connected to vowel reduction: in the noun "contract" the first syllable is stressed and has the unreduced vowel /ɒ/, but in the verb "contract" the first syllable is unstressed and its vowel is reduced to /ə/. Stress is also used to distinguish between words and phrases, so that a compound word receives a single stress unit, but the corresponding phrase has two: e.g. "a burnout" (/ˈbɜːrnaʊt/) versus "to burn out" (/ˈbɜːrn ˈaʊt/), and "a hotdog" (/ˈhɒtdɒɡ/) versus "a hot dog" (/ˈhɒt ˈdɒɡ/).222
In terms of rhythm, English is generally described as a stress-timed language, meaning that the amount of time between stressed syllables tends to be equal.223 Stressed syllables are pronounced longer, but unstressed syllables (syllables between stresses) are shortened. Vowels in unstressed syllables are shortened as well, and vowel shortening causes changes in vowel quality: vowel reduction.224
Regional variation
Phonological features in Standard English varieties225
Varieties of English vary the most in pronunciation of vowels. The best-known national varieties used as standards for education in non-English-speaking countries are British (BrE) and American (AmE). Countries such as Canada, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and South Africa have their own standard varieties which are less often used as standards for education internationally.225
English has undergone many historical sound changes, some of them affecting all varieties, and others affecting only a few. Most standard varieties are affected by the Great Vowel Shift, which changed the pronunciation of long vowels, but a few dialects have slightly different results. In North America, a number of chain shifts such as the Northern Cities Vowel Shift and Canadian Shift have produced very different vowel landscapes in some regional accents.226
Some dialects have fewer or more consonant phonemes and phones than the standard varieties. Some conservative varieties like Scottish English have a voiceless [ʍ] sound in whine that contrasts with the voiced [w] in wine, but most other dialects pronounce both words with voiced [w], a dialect feature called wine–whine merger. The voiceless velar fricative sound /x/ is found in Scottish English, which distinguishes loch /lɔx/ from lock /lɔk/. Accents like Cockney with "h-dropping" lack the glottal fricative /h/, and dialects with th-stopping and th-fronting like African-American Vernacular and Estuary English do not have the dental fricatives /θ, ð/, but replace them with dental or alveolar stops /t, d/ or labiodental fricatives /f, v/.227228 Other changes affecting the phonology of local varieties are processes such as yod-dropping, yod-coalescence, and reduction of consonant clusters.229
GA and RP vary in their pronunciation of historical /r/ after a vowel at the end of a syllable (in the syllable coda). GA is a rhotic dialect, meaning that it pronounces /r/ at the end of a syllable, but RP is non-rhotic, meaning that it loses /r/ in that position. English dialects are classified as rhotic or non-rhotic depending on whether they elide /r/ like RP or keep it like GA.230
There is complex dialectal variation in words with the open front and open back vowels /æ ɑː ɒ ɔː/. These four vowels are only distinguished in RP, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. In GA, these vowels merge to three /æ ɑ ɔ/,231 and in Canadian English, they merge to two /æ ɑ/.232
Although letters and speech sounds do not have a one-to-one correspondence in standard English spelling, spelling rules that take into account syllable structure, phonetic changes in derived words, and word accent are reliable for most English words.236 Moreover, standard English spelling shows etymological relationships between related words that would be obscured by a closer correspondence between pronunciation and spelling – for example, the words photograph, photography, and photographic,236 or the words electricity and electrical. While few scholars agree with Chomsky and Halle (1968) that conventional English orthography is "near-optimal",233 there is a rationale for current English spelling patterns.237 The standard orthography of English is the most widely used writing system in the world.238 Standard English spelling is based on a graphomorphemic segmentation of words into written clues of what meaningful units make up each word.239
Readers of English can generally rely on the correspondence between spelling and pronunciation to be fairly regular for letters or digraphs used to spell consonant sounds. The letters b, d, f, h, j, k, l, m, n, p, r, s, t, v, w, y, z represent, respectively, the phonemes /b, d, f, h, dʒ, k, l, m, n, p, r, s, t, v, w, j, z/. The letters c and g normally represent /k/ and /ɡ/, but there is also a soft c pronounced /s/, and a soft g pronounced /dʒ/. The differences in the pronunciations of the letters c and g are often signalled by the following letters in standard English spelling. Digraphs used to represent phonemes and phoneme sequences include ch for /tʃ/, sh for /ʃ/, th for /θ/ or /ð/, ng for /ŋ/, qu for /kw/, and ph for /f/ in Greek-derived words. The single letter x is generally pronounced as /z/ in word-initial position and as /ks/ otherwise. There are exceptions to these generalisations, often the result of loanwords being spelled according to the spelling patterns of their languages of origin236 or residues of proposals by scholars in the early period of Modern English to follow the spelling patterns of Latin for English words of Germanic origin.240
For the vowel sounds of the English language, however, correspondences between spelling and pronunciation are more irregular. There are many more vowel phonemes in English than there are single vowel letters (a, e, i, o, u, y, and very rarely w). As a result, some "long vowels" are often indicated by combinations of letters (like the oa in boat, the ow in how, and the ay in stay), or the historically based silent e (as in note and cake).237
The consequence of this complex orthographic history is that learning to read and write can be challenging in English. It can take longer for school pupils to become independently fluent readers of English than of many other languages, including Italian, Spanish, and German.241 Nonetheless, there is an advantage for learners of English reading in learning the specific sound-symbol regularities that occur in the standard English spellings of commonly used words.236 Such instruction greatly reduces the risk of children experiencing reading difficulties in English.242243 Making primary school teachers more aware of the primacy of morpheme representation in English may help learners learn more efficiently to read and write English.244
English writing also includes a system of punctuation marks that is similar to those used in most alphabetic languages around the world. The purpose of punctuation is to mark meaningful grammatical relationships in sentences to aid readers in understanding a text and to indicate features important for reading a text aloud.245
Some traits typical of Germanic languages persist in English, such as the distinction between irregularly inflected strong stems inflected through ablaut (i.e. changing the vowel of the stem, as in the pairs speak / spoke and foot / feet) and weak stems inflected through affixation (such as love / loved, hand / hands).248 Vestiges of the case and gender system are found in the pronoun system (he / him, who / whom); similarly, traces of more complex verb conjugation are seen in the inflection of the copula verb to be.248
The seven word classes are exemplified in this sample sentence:249
Det.
Noun
Prep.
Det.
Noun
Conj.
Det.
Adj.
Noun
Verb
Advb.
Conj.
Det.
Noun
Verb
The
chairman
of
the
committee
and
the
loquacious
politician
clashed
violently
when
the
meeting
started.
Nouns and noun phrases
English nouns are only inflected for number and possession. New nouns can be formed through derivation or compounding. They are semantically divided into proper nouns (names) and common nouns. Common nouns are in turn divided into concrete and abstract nouns, and grammatically into count nouns and mass nouns.250
Most count nouns are inflected for plural number through the use of the plural suffix -s, but a few nouns have irregular plural forms. Mass nouns can only be pluralised through the use of a count noun classifier, e.g. "one loaf of bread", "two loaves of bread".251
Possession can be expressed either by the possessive enclitic -s (also traditionally called a genitive suffix), or by the preposition of. Historically the -s possessive has been used for animate nouns, whereas the of possessive has been reserved for inanimate nouns. Today this distinction is less clear, and many speakers use -s also with inanimates. Orthographically the possessive -s is separated from a singular noun with an apostrophe. If the noun is plural formed with -s the apostrophe follows the -s.247
Possessive constructions:
With -s: "The woman's husband's child"
With of: "The child of the husband of the woman"
Nouns can form noun phrases (NPs) where they are the syntactic head of the words that depend on them such as determiners, quantifiers, conjunctions or adjectives.252 Noun phrases can be short, such as the man, composed only of a determiner and a noun. They can also include modifiers such as adjectives (e.g. red, tall, all) and specifiers such as determiners (e.g. the, that). But they can also tie together several nouns into a single long NP, using conjunctions such as and, or prepositions such as with, e.g. "the tall man with the long red trousers and his skinny wife with the spectacles" (this NP uses conjunctions, prepositions, specifiers, and modifiers). Regardless of length, an NP functions as a syntactic unit.247 For example, the possessive enclitic can, in cases which do not lead to ambiguity, follow the entire noun phrase, as in "The President of India's wife", where the enclitic follows India and not President.
The class of determiners is used to specify the noun they precede in terms of definiteness, where the marks a definite noun and a or an marks an indefinite one. A definite noun is assumed by the speaker to be already known by the interlocutor, whereas an indefinite noun is not specified as being previously known. Quantifiers, which include one, many, some and all, are used to specify the noun in terms of quantity or number. The noun must agree with the number of the determiner, e.g. one man (sg.) but all men (pl.). Determiners are the first constituents in a noun phrase.253
Adjectives
English adjectives are words such as good, big, interesting, and Canadian that most typically modify nouns, denoting characteristics of their referents (e.g. "a red car"). As modifiers, they come before the nouns they modify and after determiners.254 English adjectives also function as predicative complements (e.g. "the child is happy").255
In Modern English, adjectives are not inflected so as to agree in form with the noun they modify, as in most other Indo-European languages. For example, in the phrases "the slender boy", and "many slender girls", the adjective slender does not change form to agree with either the number or gender of the noun.256
Some adjectives are inflected for degree of comparison, with the positive degree unmarked, the suffix -er marking the comparative, and -est marking the superlative: "a small boy", "the boy is smaller than the girl", "that boy is the smallest". Some adjectives have irregular suppletive comparative and superlative forms, such as good, better, and best. Other adjectives have comparatives formed by periphrastic constructions, with the adverb more marking the comparative, and most marking the superlative: happier or more happy, the happiest or most happy.257 There is some variation among speakers regarding which adjectives use inflected or periphrastic comparison, and some studies have shown a tendency for the periphrastic forms to become more common at the expense of the inflected form.258
Determiners
English determiners are words such as the, each, many, some, and which, occurring most typically in noun phrases before the head nouns and any modifiers and marking the noun phrase as definite or indefinite.259 They often agree with the noun in number. They do not typically inflect for degree of comparison.
Pronouns, case, and person
English pronouns conserve many traits of case and gender inflection. The personal pronouns retain a difference between subjective and objective case in most persons (I/me, he/him, she/her, we/us, they/them) as well as an animateness distinction in the third person singular (distinguishing it from the three sets of animate third person singular pronouns) and an optional gender distinction in the animate third person singular (distinguishing between feminine she/her, epicenethey/them, and masculine he/him.260261 The subjective case corresponds to the Old English nominative case, and the objective case is used in the sense both of the previous accusative case (for a patient, or direct object of a transitive verb), and of the Old English dative case (for a recipient or indirect object of a transitive verb).262263 The subjective is used when the pronoun is the subject of a finite clause, otherwise the objective is used.264 While grammarians such as Henry Sweet265 and Otto Jespersen266 noted that the English cases did not correspond to the traditional Latin-based system, some contemporary grammars, including The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, retain traditional nominative and accusative labels for the cases.267
Possessive pronouns exist in dependent and independent forms; the dependent form functions as a determiner specifying a noun (as in my chair), while the independent form can stand alone as if it were a noun (e.g. "the chair is mine").268 Grammatical person in English no longer distinguishes between formal and informal pronouns of address, with the second person singular familiar pronoun thou that previously existed in the language having fallen almost entirely out of use by the 18th century.269
Both the second and third persons share pronouns between the plural and singular:
Plural and singular are always identical (you, your, yours) in the second person (except in the reflexive form: yourself/yourselves) in most dialects. Some dialects have introduced innovative second person plural pronouns, such as y'all (found in Southern American English and African-American Vernacular English), youse (found in Australian English), or ye (in Hiberno-English).
In the third person, the they/them series of pronouns (they, them, their, theirs, themselves) are used in both plural and singular, and are the only pronouns available for the plural. In the singular, the they/them series (sometimes with the addition of the singular-specific reflexive form themself) serve as a gender-neutral set of pronouns. These pronouns are becoming more accepted, especially as part of LGBTQ culture.260270271
Pronouns are used to refer to entities deictically or anaphorically. A deictic pronoun points to some person or object by identifying it relative to the speech situation – for example, the pronoun I identifies the speaker, and the pronoun you, the addressee. Anaphoric pronouns such as that refer back to an entity already mentioned or assumed by the speaker to be known by the audience, for example in the sentence "I already told you that". The reflexive pronouns are used when the oblique argument is identical to the subject of a phrase (e.g. "he sent it to himself" or "she braced herself for impact").272
Prepositions
Prepositional phrases (PP) are phrases composed of a preposition and one or more nouns, e.g. "with the dog", "for my friend", "to school", "in England".273English prepositions have a wide range of uses – including describing movement, place, and other relations between entities, as well as functions that are syntactic in nature, like introducing complement clauses and oblique arguments of verbs.273 For example, in the phrase "I gave it to him", the preposition to marks the indirect object of the verb to give. Traditionally words were only considered prepositions if they governed the case of the noun they preceded, for example causing the pronouns to use the objective rather than subjective form, "with her", "to me", "for us". But some contemporary grammars no longer consider government of case to be the defining feature of the class of prepositions, rather defining prepositions as words that can function as the heads of prepositional phrases.274
Verbs and verb phrases
English verbs are inflected for tense and aspect and marked for agreement with a third person present singular subject. Only the copula verb to be is still inflected for agreement with the plural and first and second person subjects.257 Auxiliary verbs such as have and be are paired with verbs in the infinitive, past, or progressive forms. They form complex tenses, aspects, and moods. Auxiliary verbs differ from other verbs in that they can be followed by the negation, and in that they can occur as the first constituent in a question sentence.275276
Most verbs have six inflectional forms. The primary forms are a plain present, a third person singular present, and a preterite (past) form. The secondary forms are a plain form used for the infinitive, a gerund-participle and a past participle.277 The verb to be – which among other uses in English functions as the primary auxiliary verb indicating the imperfective aspect (e.g. "I am going"), as well as the copula278 – is the only verb to retain some of its original conjugation, and takes different inflectional forms depending on the subject. The first person present form is am, the third person singular form is is, and the form are is used in the second person singular and all three plurals. The only verb past participle is been and its gerund-participle is being.279
English inflectional forms
Inflection
Strong
Regular
Plain present
take
love
3rd person sg. present
takes
loves
Preterite
took
loved
Plain (infinitive)
take
love
Gerund–participle
taking
loving
Past participle
taken
loved
Tense, aspect, and mood
English has two primary tenses, past (preterite) and non-past. The preterite is inflected by using the preterite form of the verb, which for the regular verbs includes the suffix -ed, and for the strong verbs either the suffix -t or a change in the stem vowel. The non-past form is unmarked except in the third person singular, which takes the suffix -s.275
Present
Preterite
First person
I run
I ran
Second person
You run
You ran
Third person
John runs
John ran
English does not have future verb forms.280 The future tense is expressed periphrastically with one of the auxiliary verbs will or shall.281 Many varieties also use a near future constructed with the phrasal verb "be going to" (going-to future).282
Future
First person
"I will run"
Second person
"You will run"
Third person
"John will run"
Further aspectual distinctions are shown by auxiliary verbs, primarily have and be, which show the contrast between a perfect and non-perfect past tense ("I have run" vs. "I was running"), and compound tenses such as preterite perfect ("I had been running") and present perfect ("I have been running").283
For the expression of mood, English uses a number of modal auxiliaries, such as can, may, will, shall and the past tense forms could, might, would, should. There are also subjunctive and imperative moods, both based on the plain form of the verb (i.e. without the third person singular -s), for use in subordinate clauses (e.g. subjunctive: "It is important that he run every day"; imperative Run!).281
An infinitive form, that uses the plain form of the verb and the preposition to, is used for verbal clauses that are syntactically subordinate to a finite verbal clause. Finite verbal clauses are those that are formed around a verb in the present or preterite form. In clauses with auxiliary verbs, they are the finite verbs and the main verb is treated as a subordinate clause.284 For example, "he has to go" where only the auxiliary verb have is inflected for time and the main verb to go is in the infinitive, or in a complement clause such as "I saw him leave", where the main verb is see, which is in a preterite form, and leave is in the infinitive.
Phrasal verbs
English also makes frequent use of constructions traditionally called phrasal verbs, verb phrases that are made up of a verb root and a preposition or particle that follows the verb. The phrase then functions as a single predicate. In terms of intonation the preposition is fused to the verb, but in writing it is written as a separate word. Examples of phrasal verbs are "to get up", "to ask out", "to get together", and "to put up with". The phrasal verb frequently has a highly idiomatic meaning that is more specialised and restricted than what can be simply extrapolated from the combination of verb and preposition complement (e.g. lay off meaning terminate someone's employment).285 Some grammarians do not consider this type of construction to form a syntactic constituent and hence refrain from using the term "phrasal verb". Instead, they consider the construction simply to be a verb with a prepositional phrase as its syntactic complement, e.g. "he woke up in the morning" and "he ran up in the mountains" are syntactically equivalent.286
Adverbs
The function of adverbs is to modify the action or event described by the verb by providing additional information about the manner in which it occurs.247 Many English adverbs are derived from adjectives by appending the suffix -ly. For example, in the phrase "the woman walked quickly", the adverb quickly is derived from the adjective quick. Some commonly used adjectives have irregular adverbial forms, such as good, which has the adverbial form well.287
Syntax
In the English sentence "The cat sat on the mat", the subject is the cat (a noun phrase), the verb is sat, and on the mat is a prepositional phrase composed of a noun phrase the mat, headed by the preposition on.
English has moved from the Germanic verb-second (V2) word order to being almost exclusively subject–verb–object (SVO).290 The combination of SVO order and use of auxiliary verbs often creates clusters of two or more verbs at the centre of the sentence, such as "he had been hoping to try opening it".291
In most sentences, English only marks grammatical relations through word order.292 The subject constituent precedes the verb and the object constituent follows it. The grammatical roles of each constituent are marked only by the position relative to the verb:
S
V
O
The dog
bites
the man
The man
bites
the dog
An exception is found in sentences where one of the constituents is a pronoun, in which case it is doubly marked, both by word order and by case inflection, where the subject pronoun precedes the verb and takes the subjective case form, and the object pronoun follows the verb and takes the objective case form.293 The example below demonstrates this double marking in a sentence where both object and subject are represented with a third person singular masculine pronoun:
S
V
O
He
hit
him
Indirect objects (IO) of ditransitive verbs can be placed either as the first object in a double object construction (S V IO O), such as "I gave Jane the book" or in a prepositional phrase, such as "I gave the book to Jane".294
English sentences may be composed of one or more clauses, that may in turn be composed of one or more phrases (e.g. noun phrases, verb phrases, prepositional phrases). A clause is built around a verb and includes its constituents, such as any noun or prepositional phrases. Within a sentence, there is always at least one main clause (or matrix clause) whereas other clauses are subordinate to a main clause. Subordinate clauses may function as arguments of the verb in the main clause. For example, in the phrase "I think (that) you are lying", the main clause is headed by the verb think, the subject is I, but the object of the phrase is the subordinate clause "(that) you are lying". The subordinating conjunction that shows that the clause that follows is a subordinate clause, but it is often omitted.295Relative clauses are clauses that function as a modifier or specifier to some constituent in the main clause: For example, in the sentence "I saw the letter that you received today", the relative clause "that you received today" specifies the meaning of the word letter, the object of the main clause. Relative clauses can be introduced by the pronouns who, whose, whom, and which as well as by that (which can also be omitted).296 In contrast to many other Germanic languages there are no major differences between word order in main and subordinate clauses.297
Auxiliary verb constructions
English auxiliary verbs are relied upon for many functions, including the expression of tense, aspect, and mood. Auxiliary verbs form main clauses, and the main verbs function as heads of a subordinate clause of the auxiliary verb. For example, in the sentence "the dog did not find its bone", the clause "find its bone" is the complement of the negated verb did not. Subject–auxiliary inversion is used in many constructions, including focus, negation, and interrogative constructions.298
The verb do can be used as an auxiliary even in simple declarative sentences, where it usually serves to add emphasis, as in "I did shut the fridge." However, in the negated and inverted clauses referred to above, it is used because the rules of English syntax permit these constructions only when an auxiliary is present. Modern English does not allow the addition of the negating adverb not to an ordinary finite lexical verb, as in *"I know not" – it can only be added to an auxiliary (or copular) verb, hence if there is no other auxiliary present when negation is required, the auxiliary do is used, to produce a form like "I do not (don't) know." The same applies in clauses requiring inversion, including most questions – inversion must involve the subject and an auxiliary verb, so it is not possible to say *"Know you him?"; grammatical rules require "Do you know him?"299
Negation is done with the adverb not, which precedes the main verb and follows an auxiliary verb. A contracted form of not -n't can be used as an enclitic attaching to auxiliary verbs and to the copula verb to be. Just as with questions, many negative constructions require the negation to occur with do-support, thus in Modern English "I don't know him" is the correct answer to the question "Do you know him?", but not *"I know him not", although this construction may be found in older English.300
Passive constructions also use auxiliary verbs. A passive construction rephrases an active construction in such a way that the object of the active phrase becomes the subject of the passive phrase, and the subject of the active phrase is either omitted or demoted to a role as an oblique argument introduced in a prepositional phrase. They are formed by using the past participle either with the auxiliary verb to be or to get, although not all varieties of English allow the use of passives with get. For example, putting the sentence "she sees him" into the passive becomes "he is seen (by her)", or "he gets seen (by her)".301
Questions
Both yes/no questions and wh-questions in English are mostly formed using subject–auxiliary inversion ("Am I going tomorrow?", "Where can we eat?"), which may require do-support ("Do you like her?", "Where did he go?"). In most cases, interrogative words (or wh-words) – which include who, what, when, where, why, and how – appear in a fronted position. For example, in the question "What did you see?", the word what appears as the first constituent despite being the grammatical object of the sentence. When the wh-word is the subject or forms part of the subject, no inversion occurs (e.g. "Who saw the cat?"). Prepositional phrases can also be fronted when they are the questions theme (e.g. "To whose house did you go last night?"). The personal interrogative pronoun who is the only interrogative pronoun to still show inflection for case, with the variant whom serving as the objective case form, although this form may be going out of use in many contexts.302
Discourse level syntax
While English is a subject-prominent language, at the discourse level it tends to use a topic–comment structure, where the known information (topic) precedes the new information (comment). Because of the strict SVO syntax, the topic of a sentence generally has to be the grammatical subject of the sentence. In cases where the topic is not the grammatical subject of the sentence, it is often promoted to subject position through syntactic means. One way of doing this is through a passive construction, "the girl was stung by the bee". Another way is through a cleft sentence where the main clause is demoted to be a complement clause of a copula sentence with a dummy subject such as it or there, e.g. "it was the girl that the bee stung", "there was a girl who was stung by a bee".303 Dummy subjects are also used in constructions where there is no grammatical subject such as with impersonal verbs (e.g. "it is raining") or in existential clauses ("there are many cars on the street"). Through the use of these complex sentence constructions with informationally vacuous subjects, English is able to maintain both a topic–comment sentence structure and a SVO syntax.304
Focus constructions emphasise a particular piece of new or salient information within a sentence, generally through allocating the main sentence level stress on the focal constituent. For example, "the girl was stung by a bee" (emphasising it was a bee and not, for example, a wasp that stung her), or "the girl was stung by a bee" (contrasting with another possibility, for example that it was the boy).305 Topic and focus can also be established through syntactic dislocation, either preposing or postposing the item to be focused on relative to the main clause. For example, "That girl over there, she was stung by a bee", emphasises the girl by preposition, but a similar effect could be achieved by postposition, "she was stung by a bee, that girl over there", where reference to the girl is established as an afterthought.306
Cohesion between sentences is achieved through the use of deictic pronouns as anaphora (e.g. "that is exactly what I mean" where that refers to some fact known to both interlocutors, or then used to locate the time of a narrated event relative to the time of a previously narrated event).307Discourse markers such as oh, so, or well, also signal the progression of ideas between sentences and help to create cohesion. Discourse markers are often the first constituents in sentences. Discourse markers are also used for stance taking in which speakers position themselves in a specific attitude towards what is being said, for example, "no way is that true!" (the idiomatic marker "no way!" expressing disbelief), or "boy! I'm hungry" (the marker boy expressing emphasis). While discourse markers are particularly characteristic of informal and spoken registers of English, they are also used in written and formal registers.308
Formation of new words, called neologisms, based on Greek or Latin roots (for example television or optometry) is a highly productive process in modern European languages like English, so much so that it is often difficult to determine in which language a neologism originated. For this reason, American lexicographer Philip Gove attributed many such words to the "international scientific vocabulary" (ISV) when compiling Webster's Third New International Dictionary (1961). Another active word-formation process in English is that of acronyms, which result from pronouncing abbreviations of longer phrases as single words, e.g. NATO, laser, scuba.315
Throughout its history, English has been a particularly frequent borrower of loanwords from other languages.317 West Germanic words in use since the Anglo-Saxon period still comprise most of the language's core vocabulary, as well as most of its most frequently used words.318319310 Many sentences can be constructed without loanwords, but not without core Anglo-Saxon vocabulary.320 English has formal and informal speech registers; informal registers, including child-directed speech, tend to be made up predominantly of Anglo-Saxon vocabulary, while Latinate vocabulary appears more frequently in legal, scientific, and academic writing.321322
Prolonged and intense contact with French has resulted in English having a very high proportion of Latinate words – with French loanwords borrowed during different stages of the language's history comprising 28 per cent of the English lexicon.323 In all periods of its history, English has also borrowed words from Latin directly,313310 representing another 28 per cent of the lexicon.324 In turn, many of these words had originally entered Latin from Greek. Greek and Latin stems remain highly productive sources for new literary, technical, and scientific vocabulary in English.325
Loanwords from Old Norse primarily entered English between the 8th and 11th centuries, during the Norse colonisation of eastern and northern England, and typically displaced an Anglo-Saxon equivalent. Many represent core vocabulary – including give, get, sky, skirt, egg, and cake.32638
Sign written in United States Spanish, using the English word free instead of the Spanish gratis
English has had a strong influence on the vocabulary of other languages.323327 The influence of English stems from factors such as opinion leaders in other countries knowing the English language, the role of English as a world lingua franca, and the large number of books and films that are translated from English into other languages.328 This pervasive use of English leads to the conclusion in many places that English is an especially suitable language for expressing new ideas or describing new technologies. Among the varieties of English, it is especially American English that influences other languages.329 Some languages, such as Chinese, write words borrowed from English mostly as calques, while others, such as Japanese, readily take in English loanwords written in a sound‑indicating script.330 Dubbed films and television programmes are a particularly fruitful source of English influence on languages in Europe.330
11Burnley, David (1992). "Lexis and Semantics". In Blake, Norman (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language. pp. 409–499. doi:10.1017/chol9780521264754.006. ISBN 978-1-139-05553-6. “Latin and French each account for a little more than 28 percent of the lexis recorded in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Finkenstaedt & Wolff 1973)”
20Bazelmans 2009, p. 326, "According to most researchers, this means that there cannot have been an 'original' Anglo-Frisian entity ..." Stiles 2018, p. 31, "... It is not possible to construct the exclusive common relative chronology that is necessary in order to be able to establish a node on a family tree. The term and concept of 'Anglo-Frisian' should be banished to the historiography of the subject."
41Short, Ian (2002). "Language and Literature". A Companion to the Anglo-Norman World. Boydell and Brewer. pp. 191–214. doi:10.1017/9781846150463.011. ISBN 978-1-84615-046-3.
43Johannesson, Nils-Lennart; Cooper, Andrew (2023). Ormulum. Early English text society. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-289043-6. Archived from the original on 11 August 2024. Retrieved 11 August 2024.
47Horobin, Simon. "Chaucer's Middle English". The Open Access Companion to the Canterbury Tales. Louisiana State University. Archived from the original on 3 December 2019. Retrieved 24 November 2019. “The only appearances of their and them in Chaucer's works are in the Reeve's Tale, where they form part of the Northern dialect spoken by the two Cambridge students, Aleyn and John, demonstrating that at this time they were still perceived to be Northernisms”
48Wycliffe, John. "Bible" (PDF). Wesley NNU. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2015.
64Romaine 1999a, p. 2, "Other changes such as the spread and regularisation of do support began in the thirteenth century and were more or less complete in the nineteenth. Although do coexisted with the simple verb forms in negative statements from the early ninth century, obligatoriness was not complete until the nineteenth. The increasing use of do periphrasis coincides with the fixing of SVO word order. Not surprisingly, do is first widely used in interrogatives, where the word order is disrupted, and then later spread to negatives.".
103Ward, Rowena (2019). "'National' and 'Official' Languages Across the Independent Asia-Pacific". Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies. 16 (1/2): 83–84. doi:10.5130/pjmis.v16i1-2.6510. “The use of English in Australia is one example of both a de facto national and official language: it is widely used and is the language of government and the courts, but has never been legally designated as the country's official language.”
104Oliver, Peter; Macklem, Patrick; Rosiers, Nathalie Des (10 August 2017). The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution. Oxford University Press. p. 556. ISBN 978-0-19-066482-4. Archived from the original on 21 February 2026. “Both English and French are official languages, which means that they have 'equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use...'”
106"Charter of the French language". Légis Québec. Québec Official Publisher. 26 March 2024. Archived from the original on 6 June 2024. Retrieved 5 June 2024. “French is the official language of Québec. Only French has that status.”
107"Article 8 of the Constitution of Ireland". Irish Statute Book. January 2020. Archived from the original on 23 April 2022. Retrieved 5 June 2024. “1 The Irish language as the national language is the first official language. 2 The English language is recognised as a second official language.”
110Huws, Catrin Fflur (June 2006). "The Welsh Language Act 1993: A Measure of Success?". Language Policy. 5 (2): 141–160. doi:10.1007/s10993-006-9000-0.
113"United States". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 29 May 2024. Archived from the original on 21 March 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2024. “Note: data represent the language spoken at home; the US has no official national language, but English has acquired official status in 32 of the 50 states; Hawaiian is an official language in the state of Hawaii, and 20 indigenous languages are official in Alaska.”
170Thomas, Erik R. (2003). "Rural White Southern Accents" (PDF). Atlas of North American English. Mouton de Gruyter. p. 16. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 December 2014. Retrieved 11 November 2015. [Later published as a chapter in: Bernd Kortmann and Edgar W. Schneider (eds) (2004). A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 300–324.]
184Dayag, Danilo (2008). "English-language media in the Philippines: Description and research". In Bautista, Ma. Lourdes; Bolton, Kingsley (eds.). Philippine English: Linguistic and Literary Perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. pp. 49–66. doi:10.5790/hongkong/9789622099470.003.0004. ISBN 978-962-209-947-0.
197Bjarkman, Peter C.; Hammond, Robert Matthew (1989). American Spanish Pronunciation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-87840-099-7.
247Carter, Ronald; McCarthey, Michael; Mark, Geraldine; O'Keeffe, Anne (2016). English Grammar Today. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-61739-7.
248Baugh, Albert; Cable, Thomas (2012). A history of the English language (6th ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-65596-5.
259Huddleston, Rodney D.; Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Reynolds, Brett (2022). A student's introduction to English grammar (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 124–126. ISBN 978-1-316-51464-1.
265Sweet 2014, p. 52, "But in that special class of nouns called personal pronouns we find a totally different system of case-inflection, namely, a nominative case (he) and an objective case (him)".
270Lee, Chelsea (31 October 2019). "Welcome, singular "they"". American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 14 February 2020. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
324Burnley 1992, pp. 409–499, "Latin and French each account for a little more than 28 percent of the lexis recorded in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (Finkenstaedt & Wolff 1973)".
Aarts, Bas; Haegeman, Liliane (2006). "6. English Word classes and Phrases". In Aarts, Bas; McMahon, April (eds.). The Handbook of English Linguistics. Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-6425-2.
Abercrombie, D.; Daniels, P. T. (2006). "Spelling Reform Proposals: English". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 72–75. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04878-1. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Aitken, A. J.; McArthur, Tom, eds. (1979). Languages of Scotland. Occasional paper – Association for Scottish Literary Studies. Vol. 4. Edinburgh: Chambers. ISBN 978-0-550-20261-1.
Alcaraz Ariza, M. Á.; Navarro, F. (2006). "Medicine: Use of English". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 752–759. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02351-8. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Ammon, Ulrich (2008). "Pluricentric and Divided Languages". In Ammon, Ulrich N.; Dittmar, Norbert; Mattheier, Klaus J.; et al. (eds.). Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society / Soziolinguistik Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft vov Sprache and Gesellschaft. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science / Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 3/2. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-019425-8.
Annamalai, E. (2006). "India: Language Situation". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 610–613. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04611-3. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Bao, Z. (2006). "Variation in Nonnative Varieties of English". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 377–380. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04257-7. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Barry, Michael V. (1982). "English in Ireland". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 84–134. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Bazelmans, Jos (2009). "The Early-Medieval Use of Ethnic Names from Classical Antiquity: the Case of the Frisians". In Derks, Ton; Roymans, Nico (eds.). Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity: The Role of Power and Tradition. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies. Vol. 13. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 321–338. ISBN 978-90-485-0791-7. JSTORj.ctt46n1n2.1.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo; McMahon, April (2006). "English phonology and morphology". In Aarts, Bas; McMahon, April (eds.). The Handbook of English Linguistics. Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell. pp. 382–410. doi:10.1002/9780470753002.ch17. ISBN 978-1-4051-6425-2.
Blake, Norman, ed. (1992). Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. II: 1066–1476. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003. ISBN 978-1-139-05553-6.
Lass, Roger. "Phonology and Morphology". In Blake (1992), pp. 23–154.
Boberg, Charles (2010). The English language in Canada: Status, history and comparative analysis. Studies in English Language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-49144-0.
Brutt-Griffler, J. (2006). "Languages of Wider Communication". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 690–697. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00644-1. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Carr, Philip; Honeybone, Patrick (2007). "English phonology and linguistic theory: an introduction to issues, and to 'Issues in English Phonology'". Language Sciences. 29 (2): 117–153. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.018.
Cassidy, Frederic G. (1982). "Geographical Variation of English in the United States". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 177–210. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Clark, Urszula; Asprey, Esther (2013). West Midlands English: Birmingham and the Black Country. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-4169-7.
Collingwood, Robin George; Myres, J. N. L. (1936). "The Sources for the period: Angles, Saxons, and Jutes on the Continent". Roman Britain and the English Settlements. Vol. Book V: The English Settlements. Oxford: Clarendon. JSTOR2143838. LCCN37002621.
Cohen, Antonie (2012) [1952]. The Phonemes of English: A Phonemic Study of the Vowels and Consonants of Standard English. Springer. ISBN 978-94-010-2969-8.
Collins, Beverley; Mees, Inger M. (2003) [1981]. The Phonetics of English and Dutch (5th ed.). Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-10340-5.
Connell, B. A. (2006). "Nigeria: Language Situation". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 635–637. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01655-2. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Denning, Keith; Kessler, Brett; Leben, William Ronald (17 February 2007). English Vocabulary Elements. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-516803-7.
Deumert, A. (2006). "Migration and Language". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 129–133. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01294-3. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Dixon, R. M. W. (1982). "The grammar of English phrasal verbs". Australian Journal of Linguistics. 2 (1): 1–42. doi:10.1080/07268608208599280.
Donoghue, D. (2008). Donoghue, Daniel (ed.). Old English Literature: A Short Introduction. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470776025. ISBN 978-0-631-23486-9.
Durrell, M. (2006). "Germanic Languages". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 53–55. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02189-1. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Eagleson, Robert D. (1982). "English in Australia and New Zealand". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 415–438. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Fasold, Ralph W.; Connor-Linton, Jeffrey, eds. (2014). An Introduction to Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-06185-5.
Giegerich, Heinz J. (1992). English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-33603-1.
Gneuss, Helmut (2013). "Chapter 2: The Old English Language". In Godden, Malcolm; Lapidge, Michael (eds.). Cambridge Companion to Old English Literature (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 19–49. ISBN 978-0-521-15402-4.
Görlach, Manfred (1991). Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-32529-5.
Gordon, Elizabeth; Campbell, Lyle; Hay, Jennifer; Maclagan, Margaret; Sudbury, Angela; Trudgill, Peter (2004). New Zealand English: its origins and evolution. Studies in English Language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-10895-9.
Gottlieb, H. (2006). "Linguistic Influence". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 196–206. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04455-2. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Graddol, David; Leith, Dick; Swann, Joan; Rhys, Martin; Gillen, Julia, eds. (2007). Changing English. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-37679-2. Archived from the original on 24 February 2015. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
Hickey, R. (2007). Irish English: History and present-day forms. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85299-9.
Hogg, Richard M., ed. (1992). "The Place of English in Germanic and Indo-European". Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-26474-7.
Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-43146-0. Archived from the original on 12 February 2015. Retrieved 15 March 2015.
Hughes, Arthur; Trudgill, Peter (1996). English Accents and Dialects (3rd ed.). Arnold. ISBN 978-0-340-61445-7.
"Personnel Licensing FAQ". International Civil Aviation Organization – Air Navigation Bureau. 2011. In which languages does a licence holder need to demonstrate proficiency?. Archived from the original on 20 December 2014. Retrieved 16 December 2014. “Controllers working on stations serving designated airports and routes used by international air services shall demonstrate language proficiency in English as well as in any other language(s) used by the station on the ground.”
Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. International Phonetic Association, Cambridge University Press. 1999. ISBN 978-0-521-65236-0.
Jambor, Paul Z. (2007). "English Language Imperialism: Points of View" (PDF). Journal of English as an International Language. 2: 103–123. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 December 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
Jespersen, Otto (2007) [1924]. "Case: The number of English cases". The Philosophy of Grammar. Routledge.
Kachru, B. (2006). "English: World Englishes". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 195–202. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00645-3. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
König, Ekkehard; van der Auwera, Johan, eds. (1994). The Germanic Languages. Routledge Language Family Descriptions. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-28079-2. JSTOR4176538. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
König, Ekkehard (1994). "English". In König, Ekkehard; van der Auwera, Johan (eds.). The Germanic Languages. Routledge Language Family Descriptions. Routledge. pp. 532–562. ISBN 978-0-415-28079-2. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
Labov, W. (1972). "The Social Stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores". Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 168–178. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_14. ISBN 978-0-333-61180-7. S2CID107967883.
Labov, W. (2012). "1. About Language and Language Change". Dialect Diversity in America: The Politics of Language Change. University of Virginia Press. ISBN 978-0-8139-3327-6.
Lanham, L. W. (1982). "English in South Africa". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 324–352. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Lass, Roger, ed. (2000). Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. III: 1476–1776. Cambridge University Press.
Lass, Roger. "Phonology and Morphology". In Lass (2000), pp. 56–186.
Lass, Roger (2002). "South African English". In Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.). Language in South Africa. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-79105-2.
Lawton, David L. (1982). "English in the Caribbean". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 251–280. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Leech, G. N. (2006). A glossary of English grammar. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 0-7486-2406-6.
Leech, Geoffrey; Hundt, Marianne; Mair, Christian; Smith, Nicholas (2009). Change in contemporary English: a grammatical study (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86722-1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
Levine, L.; Crockett, H. J. (1966). "Speech Variation in a Piedmont Community: Postvocalic r*". Sociological Inquiry. 36 (2): 204–226. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.1966.tb00625.x.
Li, David C. S. (2003). "Between English and Esperanto: what does it take to be a world language?". International Journal of the Sociology of Language (164): 33–63. doi:10.1515/ijsl.2003.055. ISSN0165-2516.
Lim, L.; Ansaldo, U. (2006). "Singapore: Language Situation". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 387–389. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01701-6. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Maclagan, Margaret (2010). "Chapter 8: The English(es) of New Zealand". In Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.). Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. Routledge. pp. 151–164. ISBN 978-0-203-84932-3.
MacMahon, M. K. (2006). "16. English Phonetics". In Bas Aarts; McMahon, April (eds.). The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 359–382. ISBN 978-1-4051-6425-2.
"Macquarie Dictionary". Australia's National Dictionary & Thesaurus Online | Macquarie Dictionary. Macmillan Publishers Group Australia. 2015. Archived from the original on 21 July 2019.
Mair, C.; Leech, G. (2006). "14 Current Changes in English Syntax". The Handbook of English Linguistics. Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-6425-2.
Meierkord, C. (2006). "Lingua Francas as Second Languages". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 163–171. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00641-6. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Mesthrie, Rajend (November 2010). "New Englishes and the native speaker debate". Language Sciences. 32 (6): 594–601. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2010.08.002.
Miller, Jim (2002). An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 0-7486-1254-8.
Mountford, J. (2006). "English Spelling: Rationale". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 156–159. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/05018-5. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Mufwene, S. S. (2006). "Language Spread". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 613–616. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01291-8. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Mugglestone, Lynda, ed. (2012) [2006]. Oxford History of English (Revised ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-966016-2.
McMahon, April. "Restructuring Renaissance English". In Mugglestone (2012), pp. 180–218.
Townend, Matthew. "Contacts and Conflicts: Latin, Norse, and French". In Mugglestone (2012), pp. 75–105.
Müller, Stefan (2020). Grammatical theory. Language Science Press. ISBN 978-3-96110-273-0.
"Census 2011: Release 2A". Scotland's Census 2011. National Records of Scotland. 26 September 2013. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 25 March 2015.
Patrick, P. L. (2006a). "Jamaica: Language Situation". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 88–90. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01760-0. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Patrick, P. L. (2006b). "English, African-American Vernacular". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 159–163. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/05092-6. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Payne, John; Huddleston, Rodney (2002). Huddleston, R.; Pullum, G. K. (eds.). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316423530.006. ISBN 978-0-521-43146-0.
Peters, Pam (2004). The Cambridge Guide to English Usage. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-62181-6.
Richter, Ingo (2012). "Introduction". In Richter, Dagmar; Richter, Ingo; Toivanen, Reeta; et al. (eds.). Language Rights Revisited: The challenge of global migration and communication. BWV Verlag. ISBN 978-3-8305-2809-8.
Roach, Peter (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology (4th ed.). Cambridge.
Romaine, Suzanne (1982). "English in Scotland". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 56–83. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Romaine, Suzanne, ed. (1999). Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. IV: 1776–1997. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.002. ISBN 978-0-521-26477-8.
Romaine, Suzanne. Introduction. In Romaine (1999), pp. 1–56.
Romaine, Suzanne (2006). "Language Policy in Multilingual Educational Contexts". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 584–596. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00646-5. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Rowicka, G. J. (2006). "Canada: Language Situation". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 194–195. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01848-4. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Rubino, C. (2006). "Philippines: Language Situation". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 323–326. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01736-3. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Schönweitz, Thomas (2001). "Gender and Postvocalic /r/ in the American South: A Detailed Socioregional Analysis". American Speech. 76 (3): 259–285. doi:10.1215/00031283-76-3-259. S2CID144403823.
Swan, M. (2006). "English in the Present Day (Since ca. 1900)". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 149–156. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/05058-6. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Thomas, Erik R. (2008). "Rural Southern white accents". In Edgar W. Schneider (ed.). Varieties of English. Vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean. de Gruyter. pp. 87–114. doi:10.1515/9783110208405.1.87. ISBN 978-3-11-020840-5.
Toon, Thomas E. (1982). "Variation in Contemporary American English". In Bailey, Richard W.; Görlach, Manfred (eds.). English as a World Language. University of Michigan Press. pp. 210–250. ISBN 978-3-12-533872-2.
Trudgill, Peter; Hannah, Jean (2002). International English: A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English (4th ed.). London: Hodder. ISBN 978-0-340-80834-4.
Wardhaugh, Ronald (2010). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Blackwell textbooks in Linguistics. Vol. 4 (6th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8668-1.
Wells, John C. (1982). Accents of English. Vol. 1: An Introduction (pp. i–xx, 1–278), Vol. 2: The British Isles (pp. i–xx, 279–466), Vol. 3: Beyond the British Isles (pp. i–xx, 467–674). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611759, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611766. ISBN 0-52129719-2, 0-52128540-2, 0-52128541-0.
Wojcik, R. H. (2006). "Controlled Languages". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 139–142. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/05081-1. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Wolfram, W. (2006). "Variation and Language: Overview". Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. pp. 333–341. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04256-5. ISBN 978-0-08-044854-1.
Pax Americana (Latin for 'American Peace', modeled after Pax Romana and Pax Britannica), often identified with the "Long Peace", is a term applied to the concept of relative peace in the Western…
English grammar is the set of structural rules of the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and whole texts.
Old English (Englisċ or Ænglisċ, pronounced [ˈeŋɡliʃ] or [ˈæŋɡliʃ]), Early English or Anglo-Saxon, is the earliest attested form of the English language, spoken in England and southern and eastern Scotland in the Early Middle Ages.
The settlement of Great Britain by Germanic peoples from continental Europe led to the development of an Anglo-Saxon cultural identity and a shared Germanic language, Old English, whose closest known relative was Old Frisian, spoken on the other side of the North Sea.
English phonology is the system of sounds used in spoken English. Like many languages, English has wide variation in pronunciation, both historically and from dialect to dialect.
Logistics is the part of supply chain management that deals with the efficient forward and reverse flow of goods, services, and related information from the point of origin to the point of consumption according to the needs of customers.
Anglo-Saxon England or early medieval England covers the period from the end of the Roman Empire's rule in Roman Britain in the 5th century until the Norman Conquest in 1066.
Ethnologue: Languages of the World (stylized as Ethnoloɠue) is an annual reference publication in print and online that provides statistics and other information on the living languages of the world.
The Frisian languages (FREE-zhən or FRIZ-ee-ən) are a closely related group of West Germanic languages, spoken by about 400,000 Frisian people, who live on the southern fringes of the North Sea in the Netherlands and Germany.
The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) is the principal historical dictionary of the English language, published by Oxford University Press (OUP), a University of Oxford publishing house.